The relaunch issue of Science for the People magazine is amongst us! It’s printed and being shipped to our Kickstarter supporter as I write this, so I can finally share my cover illustration (and there is more in the inside).
It was a daunting task to choose an image for the cover. The topics covered within the issue are so varied and all seem so important which didn’t feel right to pick one for the cover. I opted instead for a celebratory illustration, which tries to capture the spirit of revitalization with an explosion of different flowers/ideas. I imagined the seeds of radical science laying dormant in offices, laboratories and classrooms around the world for decades, and I hope this magazine will be a platform for them to grow and pollinate each others.
You’re still in time to get your own copy (and future issues as well) by subscribing to the magazine. And if you are an illustrator interested in working for us please let me know, I’m still looking for for contributors for the next issue ‘The Science We Need’.
PS: Also, I still haven’t received my deck, but you can start to see pictures of the Massive#sciencetarot online and they look great! These are the two main project that kept me busy last year so it’s great to see them coming to fruition.
This month, after more than 2 years since I illustrated the 1st card I have finally finished the Massive Science Tarot deck. It has been quite a journey, and I have discovered so many amazing scientists along the way! It’s definitely one of the projects I’m most proud of (on the same level as my books) and I can’t wait to see it printed in June.
The World represents an ending to a cycle of life, a pause in life before the next big cycle beginning with the fool. It is an indicator of a major and inexorable change, of tectonic breadth.
In our Science Tarot The World depicts a futuristic woman crossing a circular wreath of DNA, looking behind her to the past, while her body moves forward to the future. In her hands are scientific tools which she uses to read and modify her own genome. It represents the potential of humans to take control of their own evolution (for good or for worse).
Back in December Science for the People put out a call for proposals for the relaunch issue of the historic magazine, that went extinct in 1989. That call received more than 100 submissions from all over the world, proving that there is a real hunger for a place to discuss radical science ideas. An amazing group of writers, editors and fact checkers is now working on the first collection of articles and we are doing a kickstarter to bring you the printed edition that this project deserves.
I am working on some of the artwork for the magazine and – if I can get personal for a moment – I can say that nothing could make me more proud than seeing my illustrations associated with this organization. Science for the People came into my life just as I was growing frustrated and disillusioned with scientific research. Science communication has been my main relief valve since I completed my PhD but, eventually, I realized that no amount of communication will solve the biggest challenges we face in science today. Because the problem is not just in the way science is presented or perceived by the public, but embedded in scientific practice itself. The sexism, the privilege, the increasingly profit-oriented research model… These are the kind of issues that Science for the People is planning to address and I am completely in awe of all the people (scientists and not) who are mobilizing under this banner.
There are only 10 days left to support the kickstarter. If you have the means please consider donating to this cause: not for me or my illustrations but for all the activists who are working on this!
At the end of the month (February 28 – March 1) the Center for Science and Society is hosting an interdisciplinary conference on Narratives in the Natural Sciences and Humanities in NYC. I had the pleasure to be part of the organizing committee and I am really looking forward to the great lineup of speakers.
I was also tasked with the difficult job of coming up with an illustration for the event. We wanted something that could represent the universality of narratives, without being tied to a specific period, format or genre. We eventually settled on this concept of narratives as ‘building blocks’ of human culture, which in my mind was a reference to Jerome Bruner’s Actual Minds, Possible Worlds(one of my favourite books on the subject).
This wasn’t an easy decision and I still really like some the other sketches I made for the event. Hopefully one I will have a chance to finish them all.
Here is a sneak peek into my sketchbook, which one would you pick?
I have been teaching the Citizen Science program at Bard College for the best part of January. It was an excellent way to start the year and a great learning experience, but the class schedule didn’t leave me much time to draw. However, while my students were busy doing their final assessment I made this quick summary of the class for them! It’s also my first fully-digital drawing (I got a new toy for Christmas). Much more to come in the next few months… happy 2019 everyone!
Send us your proposal by Monday, January 14. We accept proposals for features, opinions, book and media reviews, and artwork. Please keep proposals to 300 words and image uploads to 20 mb total.
Also, I’m acting as art director for the next issue, so if you don’t have a proposal but you are an illustrator interested in doing some pro-bono work on topics of science, engineering or political organising, shoot me an email. For now we are all volunteers working on this on a zero-budget, but the plan is to make this a beautiful sustainable magazine and I’m putting together a roster of potential collaborators.
Earlier this month the kickstarter run by Massive Science to produce a Women of Science Tarot Deck (illustrated by yours truly) was successfully funded! This means that for the rest of the Winter I’m going to spend most of my weekends drawing science-themed symbolic illustrations, and I couldn’t be happier about it.
Now, some of you may ask (and have asked) “why are you mixing science and tarot? Isn’t Tarot all about magic/occult stuff?” Initially, when my friend Nadja suggested the idea I asked myself the same question. Like most people I associated ‘tarots’ with divination but – as I have later learnt – the tarot actually started as a playing cards deck, used since the mid-15th century in various parts of Europe. In fact, in Italy we still use the 4 tarot suits (spades, wands, coins and cups) as regular playing cards, without any magical associations. Only later, in the 18th century, the tarot cards began to be used for divination and magic.
Part of me is just really excited about updating this ancient tradition for our modern scientific culture. After all, the cards meaning evolved throughout history and I don’t see why we shouldn’t be allowed to do it once more. But, as a science communicator, I also think this is a great opportunity to reach a whole new audience. In particular, I have been thinking a lot lately about how scientists should engage with spirituality (especially after reading this fascinating comic by Jordan Collver and watching this conversation on Stated Casually). I grew up atheist (or religious-free, as I prefer to say) and I always had a pretty aggressive attitude toward any spiritual beliefs. But I now understand the value of a more neutral/grey zone (or ‘decompression chambers‘ to use Jon Perry’s beautiful metaphor). If we require people to reject their whole spiritual identity in order to even start reading about science then we are excluding a whole LOT of readers! A more inclusive science communication should provide some in-between spaces where people feel comfortable exploring science, without feeling immediately challenged or attacked.
I really hope that a science Tarot could play this kind role: a space for people who do not traditionally identify as ‘science geeks’ to engage with scientific concepts in a playful and non-judgemental way. And also, a good opportunity to challenge some stereotypes of what science ‘should be’ and what scientists ‘look like’ by celebrating the pioneering women scientists included in the deck.
I made this concept illustration for a side project (which shall remain unnamed for the moment) but I was eager to share it because of its seasonal palette. For now it’s just an excuse to advertise a few public which are coming up in the couple of months.
Here is the list. If they are in your city come and say hello! More dates may be added, so keep an eye on this page.
Hamilton, Ontario – McMaster University was so kind to invite me not for one, but TWO talks! If you know any students around there tell them to catch one or the other.
August flew by without me doing much drawing (or none that I’m ready to share), but I still want to post a little update.
So, here is my cover for Science for the People (SftP) special collection on Geoengineering. This was actually announced back in July but more articles are coming out in the next few months, all leading up to the official relaunch of the historic radical science magazine, next year.
This past year I have been increasingly involved with the NYC chapter of SftP and I made a few pro-bono illustrations for their T shirts and fliers. I’m really inspired by this group of scientists who are finding the time to work toward real change, instead of hiding in their ivory towers, while the world around us is falling apart. Check out their official website, if you want to learn more about them, dive in the magazine archives, and watch out for the new issues. Great things are in the works!
On a side note: I’m acting as the ‘art director’ for the SftP magazine during the relaunch so if you have old pictures/illustrations that you want to donate to the cause, shoot me an email. Also, are you interested in doing illustrations for us? Tell me your rates, our budget is limited at the moment (i.e. non existent) and we are all working as volunteers, but in the long term we definitely want to commission some art. The original magazine published lots of irreverent cartoons and I am planning to continue this tradition. I believe that avoiding jargon and demystifying science trough fun and accessible visuals is certainly part of building “a science for the people”.
After a whole year spent studying and writing about science communication this month I’m taking a holiday and to compensate I’m doing a bit of science ‘misinterpretation’.
Tomorrow I’m heading to DiNaCon, the digital naturalism conference based in beautiful Ko Lon, Thailand. Together with Undercurrent Design we started a fictional research department which uses image recognition to ‘discover’ imaginary species and produce whimsical illustrations.
We already did some tests and it was a lot of fun, check them out:
I’m really looking forward to spend some time drawing, relaxing on the beach and meet the other artists on the island. But don’t worry – you can collaborate with us too! We would love to receive submissions from all over the world and maybe even collaborate with other illustrators who want to play this digital game of telephone. Get in touch if you are interest. I’ll be back to real science in a couple of weeks.