Send us your proposal by Monday, January 14. We accept proposals for features, opinions, book and media reviews, and artwork. Please keep proposals to 300 words and image uploads to 20 mb total.
Also, I’m acting as art director for the next issue, so if you don’t have a proposal but you are an illustrator interested in doing some pro-bono work on topics of science, engineering or political organising, shoot me an email. For now we are all volunteers working on this on a zero-budget, but the plan is to make this a beautiful sustainable magazine and I’m putting together a roster of potential collaborators.
Earlier this month the kickstarter that Massive Science run to produce a Women of Science Tarot Deck (illustrated by yours truly) was successfully funded. This means that for the rest of the Winter I’m going to spend most of my weekends drawing science-themed symbolic illustrations and I couldn’t be happier about it!
Now, some of you may ask (and have asked) “why are you mixing science and tarot? Isn’t Tarot all about magic/occult stuff?” Initially, when my friend Nadja suggested the idea I asked myself the same question. Like most people I associated ‘tarots’ with divination but – as I have later learnt – the tarot actually started as a playing cards deck, used since the mid-15th century in various parts of Europe. In fact, in Italy we still use the 4 tarot suits (spades, wands, coins and cups) as regular playing cards, without any magical associations. Only later, in the 18th century, the tarot cards began to be used for divination and magic.
Part of me is just really excited about updating this ancient tradition for our modern scientific culture. After all, the cards meaning evolved throughout history and I don’t see why we shouldn’t be allowed to do it once more. But, as a science communicator, I also think this is a great opportunity to reach a whole new audience. In particular, I have been thinking a lot lately about how scientists should engage with spirituality (especially after reading this fascinating comic by Jordan Collver and watching this conversation on Stated Casually). I grew up atheist (or religious-free, as I prefer to say) and I always had a pretty aggressive attitude toward any spiritual beliefs. But I now understand the value of a more neutral/grey zone (or ‘decompression chambers‘ to use Jon Perry’s beautiful metaphor). If we require people to reject their whole spiritual identity in order to even start reading about science then we are excluding a whole LOT of readers! A more inclusive science communication should provide some in-between spaces where people feel comfortable exploring science, without feeling immediately challenged or attacked.
I really hope that a science Tarot could play this kind role: a space for people who do not traditionally identify as ‘science geeks’ to engage with scientific concepts in a playful and non-judgemental way. And also, a good opportunity to challenge some stereotypes of what science ‘should be’ and what scientists ‘look like’ by celebrating the pioneering women scientists included in the deck.
I made this concept illustration for a side project (which shall remain unnamed for the moment) but I was eager to share it because of its seasonal palette. For now it’s just an excuse to advertise a few public which are coming up in the couple of months.
Here is the list. If they are in your city come and say hello! More dates may be added, so keep an eye on this page.
Hamilton, Ontario – McMaster University was so kind to invite me not for one, but TWO talks! If you know any students around there tell them to catch one or the other.
August flew by without me doing much drawing (or none that I’m ready to share), but I still want to post a little update.
So, here is my cover for Science for the People (SftP) special collection on Geoengineering. This was actually announced back in July but more articles are coming out in the next few months, all leading up to the official relaunch of the historic radical science magazine, next year.
This past year I have been increasingly involved with the NYC chapter of SftP and I made a few pro-bono illustrations for their T shirts and fliers. I’m really inspired by this group of scientists who are finding the time to work toward real change, instead of hiding in their ivory towers, while the world around us is falling apart. Check out their official website, if you want to learn more about them, dive in the magazine archives, and watch out for the new issues. Great things are in the works!
On a side note: I’m acting as the ‘art director’ for the SftP magazine during the relaunch so if you have old pictures/illustrations that you want to donate to the cause, shoot me an email. Also, are you interested in doing illustrations for us? Tell me your rates, our budget is limited at the moment (i.e. non existent) and we are all working as volunteers, but in the long term we definitely want to commission some art. The original magazine published lots of irreverent cartoons and I am planning to continue this tradition. I believe that avoiding jargon and demystifying science trough fun and accessible visuals is certainly part of building “a science for the people”.
After a whole year spent studying and writing about science communication this month I’m taking a holiday and to compensate I’m doing a bit of science ‘misinterpretation’.
Tomorrow I’m heading to DiNaCon, the digital naturalism conference based in beautiful Ko Lon, Thailand. Together with Undercurrent Design we started a fictional research department which uses image recognition to ‘discover’ imaginary species and produce whimsical illustrations.
We already did some tests and it was a lot of fun, check them out:
I’m really looking forward to spend some time drawing, relaxing on the beach and meet the other artists on the island. But don’t worry – you can collaborate with us too! We would love to receive submissions from all over the world and maybe even collaborate with other illustrators who want to play this digital game of telephone. Get in touch if you are interest. I’ll be back to real science in a couple of weeks.
Last week I made some special illustrations for the first Massive Sciencereport, on Genetically Modified Organisms (in particular on their effects on agriculture and human health). I know this is a very sensitive subject but as a science communicator I think it is something we urgently need to discuss. Especially as the USDA is finally providing guidelines on how to label genetically ‘engineered’ foods, while the public debate around GMOs has become so polarised (and so detached from empirical evidence) that it is almost impossible to have an open-minded conversation about this.
I’m not an expert myself but as a scientist I have always been skeptic of black and white positions (the truth most often comes in shades of grey) and the proliferation of the ‘non-GMO’ label literally drives me crazy every time I walk into a Whole Foods! This is why I really appreciate the effort by the Massive team to publish clear and reliable information, from scientists who actually understand genetic engineering. I didn’t write any part of the report but I’ll be happy if my illustrations can bring a few more readers to it. Subscribe now to get full access: https://massivesci.com/reports/gmos/
On April 14th scientists all over the world will march in the streets to celebrate/demand… it’s not quite clear what! The initiative, which started last year amongst much controversy, has still very confused goals and messaging.
In case there were any doubts, I’m all in favour of addressing the lack of diversity and the many other problems afflicting scientific research, but I still think that the M4S is fundamentally a good idea. It provides an opportunity for scientists and non-scientists to get out of their ivory towers, meet each other and share their passion with the rest of the world. My hope is that along the way some of them will also realize that ‘marching for science’ one day a year is not enough. If we want science to be funded and celebrated we should active steps to make sure that our research is understood and used appropriately. That also means acknowledging that scientists are human beings and – whether we like it or not – our backgrounds, politics and other biases are all intertwined with our research. If you are interested in getting more involved I have some suggestions for you …but this a conversation for another day.
For now I hope you enjoy this the poster and join the march on April 14th 2018!
Brain Awareness Week is a “global campaign to increase public awareness of the progress and benefits of brain research”. If you live anywhere near a university chances are that there are going to be some brain-related events this week, I encourage you to look them up and engage with your local neuroscientists.
And if you want to learn more about the beautiful neural networks that hide inside you, my books are always a good place to start. Neurocomic is now available in more than 5 languages and The Senses came out with Nobrow just a few months ago. Also, for Italian-speaking children (and soon also Spanish, Portuguese and Chinese) you can order Cervellopoli from Editorial Scienza.
This week Massive Science published a special story I have been drawing for them over the holidays: Chaos in the Brickyard, a comic based on an allegorical/metaphorical story published by Bernard K. Forscher as a letter to Science in 1963. If you have been following me, you know how much I LOVE metaphors and I always loved this one in particular because I think it captures in a clear and accessible way (although extremely simplified) the process of scientific research, which from the outside may often seem like an obscure, almost mystical, endeavour.
I have been fascinated with this story for many years, since I have first read about it (I think it was in the excellent The Trouble With Scienceby Robin Dunbar). However, in the past few years, because of my work as a science communicator researcher at the Center for Science and Society I have become increasingly interested in the history and philosophy of science and the fundamental questions of what exactly is this thing called ‘Science’?
The letter does not provide answers (if you are looking for those I strongly recommend Real Science by John Ziman) but illustrates the important distinction between data collection and theory building, and what happens when this distinction is lost.
I think this is an important reminder in a world increasingly dominated by Big Tech and Big Data, which seems to value volume of research more than novelty or depth, often confusing ‘predictions’ with ‘explanations’, constantly challenging and undermining the value of the Humanities. I could rant about all of these things for hours… but I prefer to tell stories instead of giving lectures, hoping that they will be passed down the generations and spark a wider debate. So, please, go ahead and read it!
PS: also, if you enjoy allegories about science, On Exactitude In Science by Jorge Luis Borges is one of my all-times favorites (maybe the subject of a future comic?)